The EEOC and slow-walking responses by employers.

I mentioned about this one in the recent Obamaworld post.

I haven’t seen any confirmation in print, but I am wondering if “slow walking” isn’t becoming the new practice by employers who are visited with a discrimination charge.

The reason I’m saying it is because I’ve been following an IBM charge for close to two years. (October 2008). In all that time, IBM has managed, simply, not to respond. Well, not exactly. Their one response was to object to the test for a single employer, the one from Radio Union, which I also mentioned recently here. That was March 2009.

If a response to an administrative filing–which is what a discrimination charge is–can be slow walked, what good is the EEOC investigation apparatus? For the past 45 years, the investigative arm has been seen as a way to resolve incidents of discrimination (potential discrimination) without litigation.

That’s the whole thing! So many people–especially in big business–complain about litigation! But then, when a process has an alternative route, they refuse to cooperate! So which is it? Are we to conclude that big companies really just don’t want to be subject to any law that they don’t care to follow?

The EEOC is staffed with professionals who know the ins and outs of discrimination law much better than some 25-year-old law clerk to a federal judge. That’s who would be deciding your case if you wait the 6 months (after you file the required administrative charge anyway!) and then pull it into federal court. And if you ask for a jury, you have another roll of the dice.

2 thoughts on “The EEOC and slow-walking responses by employers.

  1. The EEOC had already forwarded my complaint to the Embassy of Zambia in Washington, DC. for compliance. I just hope that the Embassy will cooperate this time. The Embassy were too discriminating and abusive because of their Diplomatic Immunity. Luckily, my case falls within the exception of that immunity shield thus EEOC accepted my case.

    1. Good for you, Dolly. Of course, I don’t know your particulars, but I am happy to hear that you hung in when the respondent tried to evade their responsibility through, frankly, cheap excuses.

      That’s one reason I’ve had to wait almost two years myself.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s