Japan Upper House election: did the DPJ pay the price for a serious head fake against it?

Or is this simply more unwinding of Ichiro Ozawa’s last gambit?

The results are no suprise that Jiminto (the LDP) won handsomely. Out of the half of seats (121) that were up for Sunday’s election, the projections are that LDP won well over 70. Combining this with the 59 it had, which were not up, gives it a majority now in the Upper House. Its junior coalition member, New Komeito, adds maybe another 10 seats to boost the coalition majority, but, overall, the strength is less than the 2/3rds that would allow Prime Minister Abe to ramrod serious Constitutional changes through the Japanese parliament.

In so far as the pending consumption tax hike to 8% (April 2014) was a campaign issue, it could be that the Finance Ministry did the DPJ quite an injustice. People who follow Japan may remember that the consumption tax hike bill was one of the last things passed when DPJ still controlled the Lower House. However, it was a bill that was aggressively sponsored by the Finance Ministry heads, who (correctly) pointed out that Japan needs adequate funding sources to support social insurance payments.

Abe Shinzo looks to have turned that all around, and leaned on the Bank of Japan to provide easy money instead of tax hikes. He also talked of delaying or cancelling the consumption tax hike. Whether this was all a campaign ruse is what the Japanese public is going to find out in coming months.

The other angle to this election is that it seems to be the unwinding of what Ozawa Ichiro built in 2007, the last time these seats were up.

At that time, there was still a disgust in the Japanese hinterlands for former Prime Minister Koizumi’s postal privatization bill, which took spending power away from the barons of the various farflung feifdoms throughout Japan. The read on the bill was that those barons would no longer be able to use postal deposits to fund porkbarrel projects for their districts. Ozawa played this resentment up, and won a lot of non-traditional district seats for the DPJ.

But, since the last six years were a fiasco for these same districts under the DPJ, we see how that was going to turn out.

So, to me, the 2013 election is simply putting back Japanese politics to where Koizumi had left it in 2006. Abe is being handed what he might have thought he should have had, had the postal privatization bill never made it through the Diet in 2005. What’s unclear, of course, is what he gets to do with a government where the Upper House will no longer stymie bills proposed in the Lower. The minority of voters (33%) who actually went out and voted on Sunday apparently don’t care.


2 Replies to “Japan Upper House election: did the DPJ pay the price for a serious head fake against it?”

  1. It would have been sort of an interesting article to read, if you had not given it all away by adding that idiotic sentence at the end.

    “The minority of voters (33%) who actually went out and voted on Sunday apparently don’t care.”

    You seem to totally fail to understand the situation. Japan is not now, and never was a democracy. It is feudal society, where a small caste of crooks have all the power. Any elected government is subject to these, and also to the power of the bureaucracy. Worst of all, Japan is still a colony of the US, which has the last word when it comes down to the essentials. How much and where japanese governments spend the money is not really important to the US.
    But when they choose a Prime Minister like Hatoyama, who actually tried to put the interests of the japanese, in his case those in Okanawa, before the interests of the US, then within two weeks you can see Ms Clinton arriving and Mr Hatoyama being out of a job…

    ” The minority of voters (33%) who actually went out and voted on Sunday apparently don’t care.”

    Maybe is it you, who does not care, because you not even try to understand what that figure means. It shows that less and less Japanese have not understood, that they do not live in a democracy, and that this is the reason why they have the lowest quality of live of all rich countries. And so, instead of wasting their time being interested in politics, with its total corruption, lies and its basically one-party-system, the have put their energy back into things that really matter in their lives?

    1. I think it’s actually the best sentence. It was a “majority of a minority” that went out and gave LDP more power. This means, exactly as you say, that Japan is more of a lords-and-serfs place than a functioning democracy.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s