shout out to the Good Shepherd lawyer crowd

If California’s high court says that they can interpret canons to resolve a dispute involving property, what makes you think Pennsylvania will say, no, a state can’t?

P.S. ownership of property = control of property = rights to property

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s